
‘Social licence’ ambiguity impacting companies and communities
NEW research shows that the concept of ‘social licence’, often used by Australian mining companies to validate operations in local communities, is debateable, poorly defined and misleading. A study by public policy analyst Dr Sara Bice, based at the University of Melbourne’s School of Government, examined how mining companies conceptualised and defined their own social licence. Dr Bice voiced concerns about how these licences were applied in practice. “Mining companies are increasingly claiming to have a ‘social licence’ to operate in certain areas because of perceived benefits to the local community,” Dr Bice said. “But claims to this ‘licence’ are misleading because the term isn’t formally defined anywhere in law,” she said. “A traditional licence involves one party empowering another...