Category: Politics & Regulation

The class action is being funded by Aristata Impact Litigation Fund. Senior representatives of Aristata have travelled to the Cadia region to meet with impacted locals and hear their stories.
NewsPolitics & Regulation
Newmont hit with class action over ‘toxic trifecta’ claims at Cadia
Newmont hit with class action over ‘toxic trifecta’ claims at Cadia Landowners in NSW have filed an environmental class action against Cadia Holdings, a subsidiary of Newmont, alleging they have been exposed to pollution from the Cadia mine.Filed by William Roberts Lawyers, the claim alleges pollutants detected on private properties include arsenic, heavy metals and the “forever chemical” PFAS.The lawyers say residents have reported visible contamination in waterways around the mine since around 2024, including the Belubula River, with laboratory testing allegedly showing heavy metals, PFAS and hydrocarbons accumulating in “highly toxic foam”.The claim alleges the chemicals are linked to Cadia’s ore processing and tailings deposited in an open cut pit after the 2018 tailings dam wall collapse.The plaintiffs are seeking compensation, including damages for alleged reductions in property values, and an injunction to restrain further pollution.This isn’t the first time environmental concerns at Cadia have been raised.Community members have previously reported clouds of white dust blowing from tailings facilities, while mining dust from crushing operations at the Cadia East underground mine has also been raised as a concern.Cadia Holdings was ordered to pay more than $400,000 after being prosecuted by the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) for three dust emission offences that occurred between November 2021 and May 2023.William Roberts principal lawyer Oliver Gayner, who previously worked on the $212.5m Federal Court settlement of PFAS-contaminated communities including Williamtown, is acting for the plaintiffs.“For several years the Cadia residents have repeatedly raised their concerns about the detrimental environmental impact caused by this mine,” Mr Gayner said.“They have provided scientific evidence to Newmont and the EPA, but their concerns have not been addressed.“That is why the community are now taking this class action as a last resort. They do not want to close the mine – instead they seek what they were promised, which is a safe and sustainable mine which acts as a good neighbour.”Newmont Cadia confirmed that it had been served with proceedings in the Supreme Court of NSW.“Cadia will respond through the appropriate legal processes. As the matter is before Court, it is not appropriate to comment further at this time,” Newmont said in a statement.“Newmont takes its legal and regulatory obligations seriously and is committed to environmental stewardship.”While Cadia is currently approved to continue operations until 2031, Newmont is seeking approval from the NSW and Federal governments to extend its mining operations for about 25 years.Extending mining beyond 2031 will provide ongoing employment for more than 1500 people, 80% who live locally in Orange, Blayney and Cabonne, according to Newmont.
BHP takes ‘same job, same pay’ fight to High Court
NewsPolitics & Regulation
BHP takes ‘same job, same pay’ fight to High Court
BHP takes ‘same job, same pay’ fight to High Court BHP (ASX: BHP) is escalating its ‘same job, same pay’ case against the Mining and Energy Union to the High Court after the Federal Court dismissed the case in December.In July last year, the Fair Work Commission (FWC) ruled that BHP’s operations services fell under the Federal Government’s Same Job, Same Pay legislation, ensuring labour-hire workers are paid the same wages and conditions as directly employed staff.The law, implemented by the Federal Government in 2024, was designed to address the wage disparity seen across the Australian resources sector, which sees labour hire staff earning substantially less than directly employed workers in identical roles.BHP sought to challenge the ruling — which would affect workers at its Goonyella Riverside, Peak Downs and Saraji coal operations in Queensland — with the Federal Court, but the FWC’s decision was upheld and the case dismissed.Following the dismissal, Mining and Energy Union Queensland President Mitch Hughes said BHP has spent millions on lawyers to avoid paying coal miners fairly.“Today the Court has once again made it clear — time’s up, pay up,” he said.“From Sunday, labour hire mineworkers at BHP’s Queensland mines will finally start earning the pay they deserve — the same as the person working next to them, doing the same job.”This case has the potential to reshape the foundation of the employment landscape across the Australian resources sector — requiring companies across the industry using similar labour hire models to reassess and prepare for potential wage adjustments across the board.Federal Resources Minister Madeleine King says workers that stand alongside one another and do the same job in the same conditions with the same qualifications should be paid the same.“The FWC decision demonstrates that the legislation ensures fairness in workplaces right across the country,” she said.The wage increase may improve the financial position of an extensive number of mining families across the state, with a potential ripple effect for local economies.However, many were concerned the ruling would be a catalyst to substantial changes in workforce structure across the resources sector, potentially negatively effecting regional employment.Minerals Council of Australia (MCA) chief executive Tania Constable said the ruling was an incredibly disappointing decision that would directly threaten thousands of specialised contractors who play a vital role in mining operations across the country.“These businesses exist to provide a specialised service, not just workers, and should never have been covered by these laws,” she said.“It is now incumbent on the Government to find a legislative fix to address the ‘unintended consequence’ of all service contractors being captured.”A prominent point of contention between key players is how these changes would impact Australia’s industrial relations framework and international competitiveness.Minister King said the ruling would not undermine the nation’s competitive position in the global coal market.“What this will do is improve morale in the workplace, it is what Australians expect,” she said.
The Australian Energy Market Operator Draft 2026 ISP reaffirmed that renewable energy, firmed with storage and backed up by gas, presents the least-cost way to supply secure and reliable electricity to consumers through to 2050 as coal plants retire.
NewsPolitics & RegulationProjects & Operations
WA coal miner given 5-year lifeline as state-owned coal exit looms
WA coal miner given 5-year lifeline as state-owned coal exit looms The WA Government will extend Griffin Coal’s State Agreement from July 2026 by up to five years, allowing the Ewington Mine in Collie to continue supplying coal to industry and the privately owned Bluewaters Power Station.The WA Government says it has been in “advanced negotiations” with Griffin’s major direct and indirect customers, and that the new commercial arrangements are expected to significantly reduce the subsidy required from July 1.Details as to the reduced subsidy are not yet available, with the WA Government saying they will be provided to Parliament once new commercial arrangements are finalised.Despite the agreement extension, the WA Government maintains it is on track to retire all State-owned coal-fired power stations by 2030.In May 2025, WA Minister for Regional Development Stephen Dawson indicated that support would end in mid-2026 and that any continuation would be industry-led without ongoing government funding.“Continuation beyond 30 June 2026 will need to be industry-led on a commercially sustainable basis without ongoing WA Government funding and underpinned by Griffin Coal's customers paying a fair price for coal,” he said at the time.“If this is not achievable, coal mining operations may cease.”The extension builds on the WA Government’s $220m allocation to support continued operations at Griffin until June 2026. Announced in December 2023, the WA Government warned at the time that sudden closure risked immediate job losses and electricity system stability.The WA Government says it has now provided $308m in support to Griffin Coal since 2022, and that the extension will support energy security during the transition."Collie remains critical to our government's vision of becoming a renewable energy powerhouse, with coal fired power generation underpinning energy security and affordability as we build our major new transmission lines to connect large scale wind and solar to the grid,” WA Premier Roger Cook said."The extension of the Griffin Coal State Agreement will provide certainty to the Collie community and underpin energy security for households and businesses across the South West Interconnected System, including Perth, as we deliver the energy transition."WA Energy and Decarbonisation Minister Amber-Jade Sanderson says the commitment to retire State-owned coal by 2030 remains.“Renewables firmed by batteries and gas is the least cost mix for households and businesses — and that is what we are delivering,” she said."Extending the State Agreement is a sensible, pragmatic step to provide certainty for industry, the Collie community and the power system as we deliver the energy transition."The WA Chamber of Minerals and Energy (CME) backed the extension, with CME chief executive Aaron Morey saying it is a pragmatic step.“Not only does coal remain an important source of power generation in the SWIS, key resources operations rely on coal as a reductant or heat source in their production processes,” he said.“Industry supports the pursuit of net zero by 2050 but the pathway is not linear. It will require adjustments along the way to ensure the viability of our existing operators and to safeguard high-paying jobs in our regions.”The Mining and Energy Union (MEU) also welcomed the announcement, saying it delivers long-overdue certainty for coal workers and families in Collie while supporting energy security during the transition.MEU WA District President Greg Busson says the announcement addresses the uncertainty workers have been living with as existing funding arrangements near their end.“With the current funding arrangements coming to an end, the Government’s commitment to extend support for a further five years is a practical and responsible intervention that will keep people in jobs and give workers and the Collie community the certainty they need during the transition,” he said.“Importantly, this extension comes alongside a significant reduction in the level of subsidy required from taxpayers, while still bridging the gap in a way that keeps the lights on and workers in jobs as the transition continues.“That five-year commitment gives everyone the clarity they need to plan for an orderly and just transition, rather than facing ongoing uncertainty year to year.”Alongside the extension, the WA Government will also immediately form the Collie Basin Consolidation Taskforce.The taskforce will develop a proposed future structure for the coal assets in the basin, exploring whether the basin's two mines — operated by Griffin and Premier Coal — would be more efficiently mined by a single entity.The taskforce will be required to report back to the WA Premier within six months.
Rare earth spat simmers as China targets Japan’s military
NewsPolitics & Regulation
Rare earth spat simmers as China targets Japan’s military
Rare earth spat simmers as China targets Japan’s military Ties between China and Japan have further deteriorated this month after Beijing imposed export bans on dual-use items headed for Tokyo.Dual-use items are goods, software or technologies that have applications across both civilian and military industries — most notably, including rare earth magnets that power motors in cars and play a major role in EVs.Japan Foreign Affairs Vice Minister Funakoshi Takehiro strongly protested the measures in a meeting with Chinese Ambassador to Japan Wu Jianghao, demanding their withdrawal.The restrictions came after Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi said, in November, that an attack on Taiwan from China could trigger a Japanese military response.Prime Minister Takaichi then proceeded to approve a record spending package for the fiscal year that included a 3.8% increase in the country's annual military budget to ¥9t ($85b).China’s commerce ministry claimed the export ban would only affect military firms. However, having civilian and military applications is what gives an item dual-use status and, despite Beijing’s confidence, the repercussions throughout Japan’s industries are yet to be determined.This is not the first time China has manipulated critical raw mineral exports to Japan.In 2010, China reportedly blocked exports to Japan after an incident in the East China Sea. Whether or not shipments were actually blocked was not determined.Though the threat may have been nothing more than political posturing, Japan was incentivised to secure supply chains and, alongside stockpiling and recycling efforts, invested heavily into rare earth project outside of China to reduce its dependence on Chinese rare earths.Continuing to spearhead this shift, a mining ship departed Japanese shores this week to investigate rare earth rich mud on a world first journey to attempt to continuously lift rare-earth seabed material from 6km deep onto a ship.Due to its proximal location to Asian markets, Australian rare earth producers have been an attractive investment opportunity for countries, like Japan, working to diversify supply chains.Victory Metals chief executive Brendan Clark says rare earths are not merely commodities, they are strategic enablers.“Rare earths have become a frontline supply-chain issue, and governments are racing to address over-reliance on China, both for supply of materials and for processing,” he said.“China’s expanding use of export controls is heightening concern and we expect increasing interest in Australian rare earth offerings as a strategic hedge.”Despite the global shift for alternate supply sources, China’s dominance is bolstered significantly by its processing capability — an area the rest of the world is severely lacking.According to the Japan Organisation for Metals and Energy Security, China leads the world in reserves and production of these minerals, controlling more than 90% of global refining capacity.“Chinese authorities will fiercely protect the processing knowhow held by their local experts, making it more important than ever to invest in expertise in jurisdictions such as Australia,” Mr Clark said.Rare earth processing outside of China is rapidly expanding, led by Lynas Rare Earths’ (ASX: LYC) facilities in Australia, Malaysia and the US as well as Iluka Resources (ASX: ILU) Eneabba refinery in WA.Victory Metals (ASX: VTM) is also leading the development of onshore processing capability for several rare earth elements currently under Chinese export restriction at its North Stanmore project in WA — making it one of the few western aligned sources of these defence critical materials.“The real value lies in processing capacity and industrial capability outside China, and Victory Metals is well-positioned to take advantage of this,” Mr Clark said.China’s recent moves are a fresh reminder to both governments and manufacturers that critical mineral supply chains can be leveraged for strategic advantage.
Australia prioritises military minerals in strategic reserve
NewsPolitics & Regulation
Australia prioritises military minerals in strategic reserve
Australia prioritises military minerals in strategic reserve New details of the $1.2b Critical Minerals Strategic Reserve (CMSR) are emerging with the Federal Government confirming antimony, gallium and rare earth elements as early priorities. The announcement comes as Treasurer Jim Chalmers is scheduled to join a G7 meeting focused on critical minerals in Washington DC this Friday. In recent years, China’s dominance in the critical minerals sector has been a focal point of ongoing geopolitical tensions — particularly affecting G7 countries including the US and Japan.  With the development of the CMSR, the Federal Government is looking to leverage its abundant critical mineral reserves to diversify supply chains and shift China’s dominance. “The world needs critical minerals — Australia has plenty of them and our critical minerals reserve will help us weather global economic uncertainty and help to boost trade and investment,” Treasurer Chalmers said. "Ensuring we have a reliable reserve of these critical resources will strengthen supply chains and help to stabilise critical minerals markets.” The CMSR will secure rights to minerals produced in Australia and on-selling those rights to meet demand, giving an added boost to the critical minerals sector and strengthening reliable supply chains for trading partners Larvotto Resources (ASX: LRV), the developer of Australia’s largest antimony deposit, has voiced its support of the Federal Government’s plan. Larvotto managing director Ron Heeks says the Federal Government’s prioritisation of antimony validates the strategic importance of the company’s Hillgrove project in NSW. “Australia benefits from having a rich supply of critical minerals with the resources and expertise to produce these minerals responsibly,” he said.  “The strategic reserve supports the strong investment into the Hillgrove project and reinforces the importance of progressing final approvals efficiently as we move towards production in mid-2026.” Despite the urgency for diversification, Federal Resources Minister Madeleine King says Australia faces a long road to revenue with government seeking support for the industry which faces weak pricing and high startup capital.  “ the investment the Government is making in supporting the industry itself will be job-creating, both in the extraction side of the sector, but also in advanced processing and advanced manufacturing into the future,” she said. "There’ll be many upsides,  it won’t be revenue upside in the immediate term.  “ the outcome is yet to be determined, what we would hope for and have always advocated for is greater cooperation and collaboration with our international partners.” With a similar reliance on antimony, gallium and rare earths, the US has emerged as a major investor in the development of Australia’s critical minerals sector following the signing of a $13b critical minerals agreement between the countries in October last year. Minister King says that Australia as a nation is always dependent on international investments to build its industries and, despite the US’ recent interest in pursuing deposits in Greenland, Australia remains the superior choice for US investment. “Australia is recognised around the world as a globally important initiative into mineral exploration,” she said. “In the immediate, short to medium term, Australia is a much more desirable location  for extracting and processing minerals.”  
AREEA says it will continue to advocate for a fair, workable and balanced framework that protects productivity across Australia’s resources and energy sector.
NewsPeople & WorkforcePolitics & Regulation
Court strikes down award limits on union delegates
Court strikes down award limits on union delegates A Full Federal Court has ruled the Fair Work Commission (FWC) unlawfully narrowed workplace delegate rights in modern awards, ordering it to redo the award terms.The Federal Court found the FWC made three jurisdictional errors in varying modern awards to include a workplace delegates’ rights term.The court found the FWC impermissibly confined delegates’ representation rights to employees of the delegate’s employer, narrowed the statutory communication right and imposed absolute constraints that could unlawfully restrict the reasonable exercise of delegates’ rights.The ruling has sparked industry backlash, with Australian Resources & Energy Employer Association (AREEA) chief executive Steve Knott saying workers’ rights have been extended to engage with workplace delegates on the employer’s time and resources, provided only that they are eligible to be members of that union.“The laws create unprecedented new powers for unions, risk turning employees into de-facto union organisers, and apply across all workplaces, including non-union sites with no enterprise agreements,” he said.“ decision materially expands the scope of workplace delegate rights. It extends the right of workplace delegates, paid for by employers, to communicate with contractors and labour hire employees working at an enterprise, regardless of whether those workers are union members.”Minerals Council of Australia (MCA) chief executive Tania Constable has called the decision an “over-reach of union power”.“Today’s decision by the Full Federal Court to overturn the FWC’s orders that placed reasonable limits on the exercise of union delegate powers confirms that unions will continue to push for expanded powers which absolve union delegates of their obligations as employees and interfere with the normal performance of work,” she said.“The decision shows that the Federal Government’s Closing Loopholes legislation gives unions significantly more power than what the independent umpire determined was a fair and reasonable balance.“Australian mining companies are already feeling unprecedented cost pressures, including from industrial relations changes, mounting energy prices, lengthy and costly project approval delays and increased royalties – driving investment offshore to low-cost jurisdictions with poor environmental and emissions standards.”The MCA says it will work with other affected industries to closely review the decision and its implications and take further action as appropriate. 
Billion-dollar mine felled by a blue banded bee
NewsPolitics & Regulation
Billion-dollar mine felled by a blue banded bee
Billion-dollar mine felled by a blue banded beeLast year, former Federal Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek derailed Regis Resources’ (ASX: RRL) $1b McPhillamys gold project in NSW with a controversial Indigenous heritage ruling.Now more than a year later, the Federal Court in Sydney is hearing Regis’ case — with the company pleading that the decision should be deemed invalid due to alleged issues and failures on behalf of Minister Plibersek.Regis Resources has argued that the view held by the Federal Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) changed after additional evidence was produced by an independent Aboriginal elder more than a year after approval was granted.The Dreaming story that was given as evidence is considered controversial between Traditional Owners and Regis argues that further investigation should have taken place before the ruling was handed out.If Regis’ application is successful, the company will seek a declaration from a Federal Court judge that the Section 10 declaration is legally invalid and that the application be redetermined by a minister other than Minister Plibersek.Despite the contention, Minister Plibersek has remained adamant in her ruling.“The truth is we are living in a country where we've got thousands of years of continuous culture and heritage. We've done a pretty bad job of protecting it in the past,” Minister Plibersek said.“If we sincerely believe that we can't allow the destruction of cultural heritage in that way, then occasionally decisions like this have to be taken.“Protecting cultural heritage and development are not mutually exclusive. We can have both,” Minister Plibersek said.The ruling made in August 2024 — more than a year after the project was approved — denied the construction of a tailings dam near the Belubula River in an attempt to protect culturally significant land.“The Wiradjuri/Wiradyuri people, who traditionally lived around the Bathurst area, have significant spiritual and cultural connections to the headwaters of the Belubula River,” Minister Plibersek said at the time.“If this site were to be desecrated, it would be a threat to the continuance of Wiradjuri/Wiradyuri culture.“Crucially, my decision is not to stop the mine. The company has indicated to me that it has assessed around four sites and 30 potential options for the tailings dam.”Following the ruling, contrary to Minister Plibersek's declaration, Regis deemed the project as non-viable, stating it would take up to 10 years to identify and gain approval for an alternative tailings site, before taking out a non-cash impairment of $192m.The federal heritage protection system operates through Section 10 emergency declarations, which can override existing state approvals when sites face imminent threat of desecration. This power to operate independently from state mining approvals has created significant regulatory complexity.The Regis protection order challenge is an example of these two-tier regulatory system dynamics.During the initial assessment process, Regis consulted the Orange Local Aboriginal Council, who was believed to be the legally recognised Traditional Owner representatives of the region.In 2020, Wiradjuri Elder Aunty Nyree Reynolds lodged a protection application which failed to meet the required protection criteria. The application was made independent of the Orange Local Aboriginal Land Council and NSW Aboriginal Land Council.The NSW Government granted the McPhillamys project approval in 2023 but critical cultural evidence regarding the Blue Banded Bee Dreaming story emerged after approval was received, completely shifting the assessment trajectory.The federal protection orders were implemented in late 2024 despite the significance of the evidence being disputed between the Wiradjuri community.Under the federal protection system process, it was considered unnecessary to undertake additional consultation with Regis Resources.Following the ruling, Regis Resources chief executive Jim Beyer said the required restart of the approvals process with the NSW and Federal Governments could take up to 10 years, with no certainty of a viable alternative being realised.“Following the surprising and disappointing Section 10 Declaration by Minister Plibersek, Regis has commenced an assessment of the impacts on the economic value of our business,” he said.Regis Resources announced its decision to contest the ministerial decision shortly after, arguing the company was not afforded the opportunity to respond to the change in the application following the accumulation of new evidence.
Back to of the page